| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-C (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180326 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 20 '19 at 16:25 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | MDA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
|
73.5%
Very good
|
73% 126 Pts
|
46% 340 Pts
|
23% 370 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.84
|
34%
Below average
|
34% 39.7 fps
|
34% 42 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 19 38 57 53 104 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
16% 22.1 MB/s
|
23% 0.2 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
211GB free
Firmware: GG2ZBF40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 7.5 7.7 9.4 12 18 MB/s
|
6.04%
Terrible
|
9% 12 MB/s
|
40% 0.3 MB/s
| |
|
|
24% 31.3 MB/s
|
112% 0.93 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
58.8%
Above average
|
59% 20.6 GB/s
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
57% 69.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,999 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 460x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 296x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 223x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 300x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 201x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 172x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $297 |