MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 12:04
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
SC Int 111
SC Float 119
SC Mixed 85.6
84% 105 Pts
QC Int 419
QC Float 460
QC Mixed 412
97% 430 Pts
MC Int 912
MC Float 933
MC Mixed 944
139% 930 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$216
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 239
Reflection 209
Parallax 321
83% 256 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 242
Splatting 150
81% 185 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$116
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 115 122 117 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 397
Write 127
Mixed 180
SusWrite 117
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 33.8
130% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 150
114% 154 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 81%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$150
198GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 448 447 440 441 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 439
Mixed 317
SusWrite 445
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 38.1
138% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 160
149% 222 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$90
466GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 55
SusWrite 98.7
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
27GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 100
Write 75.7
Mixed 82.5
107% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 32%
Maxtor OneTouch 1TB
157GB free, PID 7300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 12.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 32.7
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 20%
Generic MassStorageClass 128GB
119GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 22 21 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.6% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 25.8
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 26.1
38% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.1
145% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 29.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82%
Great: 113%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 13,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 132% - Outstanding Total price: $700
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $610SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback