| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Default string (all builds) |
| Motherboard | INTEL SKYBAY |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170718 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 20 '19 at 11:43 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.6%
Very good
|
82% 141 Pts
|
43% 326 Pts
|
20% 325 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Device(107D 2777) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
151%
Outstanding
|
167% 216 fps
|
157% 200 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SQF-S25M8-64G-S8C 64GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06A7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 99 98 98 95 MB/s
|
60.3%
Good
|
44% 201 MB/s
|
103% 43.2 MB/s
|
60% 95.2 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
11GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 54 54 54 53 54 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
90% 81.8 MB/s
|
587% 8.6 MB/s
|
678% 10 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend TS512MLH64V1H 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
76.1%
Very good
|
76% 26.5 GB/s
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
66% 60.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,513 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Default string
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,018x |
| Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 956x |
| Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 906x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 486x |
| UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 478x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 458x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |