Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '19 at 03:13
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 79.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 231 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 827 79% 654 Pts	64-Core 1,290 80% 1,290 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.2% Above average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 68.8 Parallax 62.3 49% 63.9 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 60.5 Splatting 68.3 55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 297 280 297 279 281 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 451 Mixed 401 SusWrite 296 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 48.7 166% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 358 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 346GB free Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1038 832 793 850 817 802 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 1,902 Write 1,649 Mixed 1,529 SusWrite 855 332% 1,484 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 58.4 193% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 853 DQ Write 530 DQ Mixed 747 542% 710 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 297%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2TB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 178 167 176 161 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 2.7 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 169 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.4 419% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 25GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 2.8 3.9 3.2 4.3 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	7.42% Terrible	Read 29.3 Write 9.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 3.7 12% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 3 132% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.42% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2Z3200C16 2x8GB 1,555 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.3% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 17.4 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 80.9 50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	84x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	44x
Ryzen TR 2920XAMDBench 81%, 3,902 samples	38x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	16x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 128%, 25 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 94%, 8,912 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,053

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16