Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 86.4 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 138 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 218 29% 219 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DB) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.15% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.35 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.46 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.48 2% 2.89 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.15% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM08L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 206 195 181 151 180 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 234 Write 192 Mixed 167 SusWrite 189 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 12.8 49% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 63.2 DQ Mixed 24.7 37% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-8GBSQ Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	11x

SSD
MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GBSamsungBench 40%, 3,175 samples	3x
THNSNC128GCSJ 128GBToshibaBench 36%, 1,192 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	6x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 44%, 1,464 samples	2x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16