Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6276 70 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 4 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 72.4 1-Core 33.4 2-Core 51.1 38% 52.3 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 252 24% 197 Pts	64-Core 1,910 118% 1,910 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Q-360 360GB 1,222 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: T180910 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 152 127 64 63 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 166 Write 157 Mixed 151 SusWrite 118 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 17 58% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 20.7 DQ Write 29.7 DQ Mixed 19.2 16% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 16x16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 16 of 32 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.2% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.3 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 10.7 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 96 42% 96 ns
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63801stBench 50%, 73 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 1TBSandiskBench 39%, 189 samples	1x

RAM
M393B5170FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 32GBSamsungBench 26%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 29% - Poor

Total price: $279

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16