| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121114 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 19 '19 at 17:02 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.6%
Above average
|
52% 82.4 Pts
|
28% 217 Pts
|
14% 234 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.1%
Above average
|
58% 73 fps
|
53% 65.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 80 58 52 47 46 MB/s
|
47.1%
Average
|
38% 169 MB/s
|
101% 33.1 MB/s
|
34% 47.5 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
308GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 122 122 123 122 MB/s
|
70.6%
Very good
|
74% 102 MB/s
|
138% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Intenso External USB 3.0 500GB
367GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 29 28 MB/s
|
16%
Very poor
|
18% 25.2 MB/s
|
67% 0.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
46.2%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
27% 9.43 GB/s
|
53% 75.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L LE Builds (Compare 216 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L LE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 34x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 27x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |