Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 15:48
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 99%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 228
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 730
69% 571 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 201
Parallax 235
154% 209 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 198
Splatting 131
141% 178 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 140%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1174 1168 527 482 533 517 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,559
Write 1,410
Mixed 906
SusWrite 733
258% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 64.5
217% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 1,043
DQ Mixed 1,110
837% 1,122 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 225%
Great: 296%
Asmt 2115 1TB
27GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 207 204 186 211 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 266
Write 264
Mixed 280
SusWrite 202
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 22.8
77% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 95.4
74% 102 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 76%
WD My Passport 2603 4TB
3TB free, PID 2603
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 89 78 89 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 118
Write 86
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 84.9
113% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 64%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
104GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 47 53 47 50 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 60.3
Write 51.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 50.2
68% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 24.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback