Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% rBGA1288 Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 35.8 1-Core 39.3 2-Core 71 29% 48.7 Pts	4-Core 92 8-Core 91.8 12% 91.9 Pts	64-Core 91.7 6% 91.7 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 0007) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.62 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB 3,217 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 110 80 64 63 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.8% Poor	Read 115 Write 92 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 89.5 22% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 14.2 52% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 71.7 DQ Write 95.4 DQ Mixed 85.3 64% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	36x

SSD
THNSNC128GMLJ 128GBToshibaBench 31%, 189 samples	5x
Agility 3 120GBOCZ $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $65

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16