Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 960-$220 16,233 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 160 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 400 44% 346 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6171) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.4% Very good	Lighting 83.3 Reflection 115 Parallax 98.4 68% 98.8 fps	MRender 99 Gravity 96.8 Splatting 101 81% 99 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 483GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 119 117 118 119 119 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230 19,674 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 383GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 89 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 79.7 Write 42.5 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 88.7 48% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.1 382% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.9% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	17x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	13x
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	13x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $184

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16