Supermicro X9SRL-F

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro X9SRL-F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SRL-F
Memory	94.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150116
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '19 at 15:11
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 1,619 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 155 61% 104 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 685 58% 498 Pts	64-Core 1,068 66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Lighting 30.5 Reflection 33.3 Parallax 38.7 25% 34.1 fps	MRender 31.5 Gravity 31.4 Splatting 35 27% 32.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 351 348 356 355 366 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 405 Write 294 Mixed 362 SusWrite 359 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 26.7 99% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 183 150% 209 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 650GB free Firmware: ABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 123 123 123 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 128 Write 119 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 123 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55 3,016 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 120GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 65 65 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 43 Write 16 Mixed 32 SusWrite 64.5 29% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 171GB free Firmware: A3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 130 132 132 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 122 Write 126 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 130 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 53GB free Firmware: A3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 68 67 68 68 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 92 Write 90.3 Mixed 54 SusWrite 66.5 56% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 79%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 176GB free Firmware: ABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 111 112 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 126 Write 117 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 111 71% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH9 8x16GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	MC Read 36.4 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 31.3 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 10.3 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9SRL-F Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRL-F

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2640 v2IntelBench 59%, 406 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples	1x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	2x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	2x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	1x
X100 128GBSanDiskBench 73%, 1,695 samples	1x

RAM
36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 4x8GBMicronBench 70%, 42 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 4x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 559 samples	1x
BLS8G3D169DS3.16F 4x8GBCrucialBench 83%, 25 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $504

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16