Asrock Z77 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 18 '19 at 11:21
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 118
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 471
63% 470 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB; Palit GeForce RTX 2070 Dual V1
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3625 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 136
Parallax 138
116% 139 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 139
Splatting 109
115% 146 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 341 110 111 110 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 410
Mixed 381
SusWrite 180
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 45.5
144% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 134%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78
4GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.4
Write 81.1
Mixed 63.3
59% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
280GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 155 163 171 154 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 133
Write 135
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 159
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
25GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 62 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 77.5
Write 76.5
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 61.9
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
37GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 139 138 139 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 89.9
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 138
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 103%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 164 166 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 166
Write 171
Mixed 126
SusWrite 164
213% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 20.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro3 Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro3 - $212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $492
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback