Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP900X4C-A03CA
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150715
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateJun 18 '19 at 07:19
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
CPU Throttled 79%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3517U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.9% Poor
SC Int 49.8
SC Float 51.1
SC Mixed 38.3
37% 46.4 Pts
QC Int 130
QC Float 130
QC Mixed 130
30% 130 Pts
MC Int 129
MC Float 130
MC Mixed 132
20% 130 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 2.8
1% 3.73 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5.7
2% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC256HBGJ-000H1 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM12K1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 92 98 93 84 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 354
Write 251
Mixed 197
SusWrite 101
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 15
47% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 78.6
DQ Mixed 123
98% 141 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $610SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback