MSI H270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A68
MotherboardMSI H270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170207
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '19 at 03:46
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 250
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 565
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7A68) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 0.09
0% 3.81 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 16.4
10% 12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 195
Parallax 179
146% 184 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 179
Splatting 116
110% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 170 100 135 106 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,008
Write 232
Mixed 359
SusWrite 139
95% 435 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 41.4
168% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 379
340% 518 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 126%
Great: 144%
Kingston SSDNow SNV Series 128GB
18GB free
Firmware: D100309a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 175 159 177 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 206
Write 157
Mixed 103
SusWrite 173
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 7.2
32% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 22.5
DQ Mixed 8.2
9% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 30%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
368GB free
Firmware: AM0B1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 107 108 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 106
64% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 60%
Generic MassStorageClass 16GB
5GB free, PID 0749
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 63 63 65 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 86.7
Write 65.7
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 63.4
88% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.6
105% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 19.5
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 20.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68) Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI H270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $441
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback