Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 18 '19 at 01:34
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 748
70% 583 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1331 MHz, MLim: 1756 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 82.6
51% 71.1 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 54.6
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,228
Write 2,117
Mixed 1503
434% 1,949 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 71
231% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 757
550% 720 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Toshiba MK3259GSX 320GB
127GB free
Firmware: GK003U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 66 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 66.5
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 65.9
37% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$30
127GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 177 172 180 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 85
Mixed 70
SusWrite 176
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 184 177 185 186 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 101
Mixed 71
SusWrite 182
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
218GB free
Firmware: 0003BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 49.3
Write 13.2
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 60.9
28% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
598GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 60
SusWrite 103
124% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 31.2
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 27.2
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $541
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback