| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 1.41% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus B150M-A/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160506 |
| Uptime | 3.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 17 '19 at 09:23 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.6%
Very good
|
78% 137 Pts
|
49% 363 Pts
|
23% 372 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.5%
Average
|
55% 66.1 fps
|
32% 45.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AVSSDS3E100Z-120GB 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFD00.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 65 0.9 0.8 0.9 38 MB/s
|
1.41%
Terrible
|
9% 37.5 MB/s
|
1% 0.33 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
283GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 131 133 134 134 MB/s
|
77.2%
Very good
|
88% 121 MB/s
|
139% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
61.3%
Good
|
61% 21.3 GB/s
|
54% 18.8 GB/s
|
58% 69.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B150M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,421 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus B150M-A/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 264x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 255x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 172x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 219x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 146x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 107x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $273 |