| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Supermicro X9DRG-QF (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRG-QF |
| Memory | 60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150325 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 17 '19 at 00:01 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
73.5%
Very good
|
70% 120 Pts
|
60% 500 Pts
|
104% 1,687 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
121%
Outstanding
|
128% 176 fps
|
121% 150 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 337 314 313 333 417 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
88% 393 MB/s
|
152% 54.2 MB/s
|
247% 336 MB/s
|
|
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
865GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 92 92 91 92 MB/s
|
70.2%
Very good
|
89% 121 MB/s
|
238% 1.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
98.7%
Outstanding
|
115% 40.3 GB/s
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
54% 74.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9DRG-QF Builds (Compare 13 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9DRG-QF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v21stBench 63%, 551 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 2x |
| GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $130 |