Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
18 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 23:01
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$198
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
92% 160 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 781
83% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,027
69% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$1,096
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1291 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.5% Good
Lighting 276
Reflection 248
Parallax 276
72% 267 fps
MRender 155
Gravity 243
Splatting 165
66% 188 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$44
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 218 179 139 152 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,716
Write 824
Mixed 216
SusWrite 192
160% 737 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 44.9
146% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 45.4
DQ Mixed 473
308% 377 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 141%
Great: 239%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$85
170GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 294 294 294 295 294 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 487
Mixed 401
SusWrite 314
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 61.3
209% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
261% 341 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
836GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 86 85 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 106
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 86.7
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 24.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 22.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 91%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 5,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $1,144
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback