Lenovo 80QQ

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80QQ (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Nano 5B6
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161021
Uptime	18.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '19 at 22:30
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	78%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4288U 1,909 User benchmarks, average bench 56% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 85.2 1-Core 51.5 2-Core 68.7 48% 68.5 Pts	4-Core 91.8 8-Core 146 15% 119 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz) 4,565 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 39FF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.09% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 5.44 3% 4.21 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 6.3 4% 4.12 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.09% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GB 1,308 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 83 87 67 56 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 355 Write 76.5 Mixed 158 SusWrite 76 36% 166 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 21.3 82% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 34.7 70% 147 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.3 3.7 3.2 4.4 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	6.16% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 4.5 Mixed 12 SusWrite 3.5 11% 9.82 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.2 72% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.16% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GB 10,170 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 6.8 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 4.9 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80QQ Builds (Compare 1,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80QQ

CPU
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	564x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	347x
Core i5-4288UIntelBench 56%, 1,909 samples	186x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	811x
Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 4,565 samples	142x
GeForce 920MNvidiaBench 5%, 11,731 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	30x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	24x

RAM
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	218x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	174x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	149x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16