HP 500-164

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP 500-164 (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2AE0
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131003
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '19 at 20:05
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135 7,219 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 77.2 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 101 52% 81.3 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 200 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.9% Poor	Lighting 34.1 Reflection 23.3 Parallax 15.7 28% 24.4 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 35.4 22% 25.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 240GB 3,491 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 294 276 281 282 279 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 450 Write 396 Mixed 391 SusWrite 293 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 49.2 161% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 135 134% 214 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 192 191 192 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 188 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 190 119% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB 7,106 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.8% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 7.4 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 500-164 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP 500-164

CPU
A8-6500 APUAMD $135Bench 50%, 7,219 samples	27x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples	15x
GeForce GT 635NvidiaBench 6%, 3,722 samples	2x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 240GBSpccBench 71%, 15,968 samples	1x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	1x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 29%, 6,196 samples	5x
HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 27%, 1,957 samples	5x
HP698651-154-KEB 1x8GBKingstonBench 25%, 275 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $135

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16