Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 14:54
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 245
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 799
73% 611 Pts
64-Core 1,111
69% 1,111 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 63.6
57% 69.1 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 71.4
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 582 303 303 298 295 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,963
Write 1,449
Mixed 662
SusWrite 346
244% 1,105 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 50.6
212% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,049
DQ Write 1,111
DQ Mixed 686
625% 949 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 211%
Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
140GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1971 887 885 888 891 889 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,451
Write 2218
Mixed 1,754
SusWrite 1,068
419% 1,873 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 90.6
305% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,402
DQ Write 1,225
DQ Mixed 1,298
977% 1,308 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 316%
Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
141GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 76 77 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 79.2
Write 78.7
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 76.4
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
395GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 97 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 85
Write 95.8
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 96.6
106% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.7
Write 73.5
Mixed 28.3
73% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22.3
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $979
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback