Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 07:27
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 260
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 768
78% 631 Pts
64-Core 994
62% 994 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 142
Parallax 120
103% 129 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 130
Splatting 109
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 599 596 593 597 597 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,486
Write 2,337
Mixed 1,614
SusWrite 646
395% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 75.7
248% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 694
508% 672 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 246%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
364GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 482 412 432 415 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 466
Mixed 420
SusWrite 447
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 58.7
194% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 145 147 147 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 148
Write 146
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 146
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB-$92
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 46.3
MC Mixed 46.9
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 23.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 121%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback