Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 78.4 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 151 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 204 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5400M 1,652 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 21F4) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.25 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.01% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 5.81 Parallax 3.97 4% 4.93 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 4.93 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.01% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,845 Write 4,873 Mixed 4,374 1,050% 4,697 MB/s	4K Read 322 4K Write 186 4K Mixed 221 869% 243 MB/s	DQ Read 1010 DQ Write 1083 DQ Mixed 268 416% 787 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 22,647 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.7 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	1x

GPU
NVS 5400MNvidiaBench 4%, 1,652 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	1x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $104

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16