| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Supermicro X9SRL-F (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9SRL-F |
| Memory | 120 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150116 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 16 '19 at 01:03 |
| Run Duration | 213 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
75%
Very good
|
65% 109 Pts
|
62% 516 Pts
|
71% 1,141 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.3%
Below average
|
44% 53.5 fps
|
31% 36.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 504 507 505 499 502 MB/s
|
||||
|
Nvme MT0800KEXUU 800GB
745GB free
Firmware: HPK3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1710 1699 1708 1701 1704 1714 MB/s
|
222%
Outstanding
|
311% 1,370 MB/s
|
171% 63.9 MB/s
|
365% 471 MB/s
|
|
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 163 162 162 162 MB/s
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
86% 120 MB/s
|
177% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
87.1%
Excellent
|
98% 34.2 GB/s
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
52% 76.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9SRL-F Builds (Compare 10 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9SRL-F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 2x |
| Xeon E5-2640 v2IntelBench 59%, 406 samples | 1x |
| Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 2x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $504 |