Asus X750LN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus X750LN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X750LN
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 00:49
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 89
2-Core 149
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 209
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 14FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 3.34
3% 5.58 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.26
5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541515A9E630 1.5TB
586GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KA0OA500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 53 54 55 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 57.3
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 56.1
34% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
300GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 75.6
Write 82.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 83.3
92% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1.5TB
68GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 22.3
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 37.9
43% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X750LN Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X750LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $439
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback