Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 20:41
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 648
72% 570 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 39.4
37% 43.4 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 41
Splatting 36.2
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 291 294 256 244 237 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 451
Mixed 381
SusWrite 276
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 50.6
171% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
34GB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 88 84 93 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 76.3
Write 80.7
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 91.1
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.6
226% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
143GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 119 93 83 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 121
Write 87.7
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 99.4
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
327GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 152
Write 146
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 118
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
256% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 24.9
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback