| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | PC Amd Am4 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING |
| Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190307 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 15 '19 at 18:01 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
83% 151 Pts
|
77% 633 Pts
|
80% 1,292 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Zotac(19DA 1507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
119%
Outstanding
|
130% 153 fps
|
112% 142 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU800NS38 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 258 196 291 369 405 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
92% 412 MB/s
|
173% 61 MB/s
|
180% 253 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 211 200 214 212 216 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
115% 157 MB/s
|
155% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
75.6%
Very good
|
77% 27.1 GB/s
|
66% 23.1 GB/s
|
48% 83.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Amd Am4 Builds (Compare 102 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: PC Amd Am4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 27x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 20x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 17x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 8x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $604 |