PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Acer Predator G5910 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Predator G5910 |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111222 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 15 '19 at 17:40 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 1080 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 146 85 81 58 51 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
Crucial BX300 480GB-$70
111GB free
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 241 236 341 244 236 MB/s
|
81.7%
Excellent
|
|||
C400-MTFDDAK064MAM 64GB
12GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 30 11 30 28 31 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
283GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 87 91 90 85 MB/s
|
50.2%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
10GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 6.6 7.2 8.5 8.6 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 47x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 45x |
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 17x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 33% - Below average | Total price: $551 |