Lenovo 23252A6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 23252A6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 23252A6
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170419
Uptime26.6 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 13:01
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 103
54% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 197
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 3
4% 4.38 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.26
5% 5.34 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LE1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 144 159 155 159 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 340
Write 212
Mixed 228
SusWrite 155
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 26.3
92% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 29.8
79% 169 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback