Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '19 at 11:08
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 88.1 1-Core 123 2-Core 243 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 810 78% 644 Pts	64-Core 1,017 63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Lighting 72.4 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 90 59% 78.5 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 73.3 Splatting 59.4 55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 125 125 131 108 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 493 Write 489 Mixed 313 SusWrite 146 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 23.6 105% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 57.2 DQ Mixed 84 66% 93 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 95%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 606GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 104 104 104 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 108 Write 55.7 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 104 62% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	MC Read 51.4 MC Write 49.9 MC Mixed 43.5 138% 48.3 GB/s	SC Read 29.2 SC Write 47.5 SC Mixed 36.4 108% 37.7 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	26x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	7x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $398

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16