Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 10:54
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700K-$340
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
SC Int 134
SC Float 144
SC Mixed 119
106% 132 Pts
QC Int 437
QC Float 448
QC Mixed 418
98% 435 Pts
MC Int 705
MC Float 808
MC Mixed 760
113% 757 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$250
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Lighting 229
Reflection 211
Parallax 245
73% 229 fps
MRender 151
Gravity 222
Splatting 174
78% 182 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 367 366 375 372 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 356
Write 373
Mixed 302
SusWrite 340
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 35.6
128% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 188
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 134%
Palit PSP240 SSD 240GB
202GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 5.3 5.9 6.6 9.2 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.3% Poor
Read 240
Write 93.4
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 30.6
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 8.6
41% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 57.2
DQ Mixed 139
76% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 76%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$58
200GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 220 95 90 88 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 496
Write 450
Mixed 194
SusWrite 143
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 39.7
143% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 167
138% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 167 165 166 164 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 138
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 165
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 116%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$79
62GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 106 105 106 108 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 86
Write 90.4
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 104
57% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown W4U2400PS-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78%
Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 2,901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,212
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback