HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180730
Uptime	21.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '19 at 03:05
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	10%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 77.7 1-Core 63.4 2-Core 118 54% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 306 26% 225 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 8% HP(103C 176C) 2GB CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.51 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	6.68% Terrible	Lighting 7.23 Reflection 6.77 Parallax 8.75 6% 7.58 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 8.67 Splatting 11 8% 9.89 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.68% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 346GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 328 395 398 405 406 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 439 Write 388 Mixed 356 SusWrite 374 88% 389 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 28.2 96% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 352 267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 133%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100V 1TB 2,427 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 851GB free Firmware: AX001Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 100 100 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 102 Write 97.5 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 96.3 62% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264HZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16JTF51264HZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.5% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	99x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	92x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	82x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	296x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16