HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3577
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111217
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 22:53
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 53.6
1-Core 20.1
2-Core 39.2
27% 37.6 Pts
4-Core 37.3
8-Core 35.9
5% 36.6 Pts
64-Core 37.4
2% 37.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.1.2000
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.56
1% 1.59 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.41 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$10
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 23 17 15 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.11% Terrible
Read 12
Write 15.8
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 16.2
10% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
58% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.11%
Great: 47%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
3TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 21.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 18
30% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 15%
Great: 98%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000, Jetflash 600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
5.65% Terrible
Read 22
Write 6
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 10.4
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.65%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Presario CQ57 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $148
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback