Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Atcomputers TRILINE PROFI I75 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte H55M-UD2H
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101125
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '19 at 10:17
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 661-$80 2,457 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 75 1-Core 105 2-Core 200 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 266 35% 263 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 042B) 1GB CLim: 1170 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 19 Parallax 26.1 16% 21.7 fps	MRender 15 Gravity 18.4 Splatting 20.6 15% 18 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 131 135 129 140 129 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.7% Average	Read 178 Write 183 Mixed 175 SusWrite 134 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 28.4 99% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.4 DQ Write 90.2 DQ Mixed 41.9 38% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 16.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 10.3 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $197

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16