Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful C.A68HM-K PLUS
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181112
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 05:48
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 96.8
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 85.2
56% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 84.8
8-Core 92.4
12% 88.6 Pts
64-Core 105
7% 105 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1315) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 21.2
5% 19.7 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 18.2
4% 14.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Clover CD253GJ 250GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 62 67 67 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
Read 93.5
Write 107
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 59.9
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 61%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
222GB free
Firmware: VT10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 66 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 69.8
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 65.7
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
21GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Read 0.3
Write 0.3
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 0.4
0% 0.33 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical string Builds (Compare 2,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback