Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful C.A68HM-K PLUS
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181112
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 05:48
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.3% Poor
SC Int 56.4
SC Float 56.7
SC Mixed 58.3
46% 57.1 Pts
QC Int 87.1
QC Float 70.3
QC Mixed 84.8
18% 80.7 Pts
MC Int 123
MC Float 94.4
MC Mixed 105
16% 108 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1315) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 21.2
6% 19.7 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 18.2
6% 14.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Clover CD253GJ 250GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 62 67 67 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
Read 93.5
Write 107
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 59.9
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.27 MB/s
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
222GB free
Firmware: VT10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 66 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 69.8
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 65.7
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36%
Great: 40%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
21GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Read 0.3
Write 0.3
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 0.4
0% 0.33 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical string Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback