Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 146% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180917
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '19 at 23:15
Run Duration	344 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 75.2 1-Core 119 2-Core 242 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 943 84% 710 Pts	64-Core 2,396 148% 2,396 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	142% Outstanding	Lighting 179 Reflection 225 Parallax 237 146% 214 fps	MRender 262 Gravity 224 Splatting 144 165% 210 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 808 636 635 637 638 625 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 1,608 Write 1457 Mixed 714 SusWrite 663 248% 1,111 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 35.1 116% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 406 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 363 277% 375 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 254%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 206GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1352 306 307 307 305 306 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,790 Write 1,398 Mixed 624 SusWrite 480 238% 1073 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 42.3 158% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 513 DQ Write 368 DQ Mixed 462 339% 448 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 223GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2181 657 600 596 599 596 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 2,022 Write 1,665 Mixed 1,341 SusWrite 872 330% 1,475 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 91 4K Mixed 60.4 200% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 535 DQ Write 418 DQ Mixed 510 372% 488 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 47GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,803 Write 3185 Mixed 2,905 664% 2,964 MB/s	4K Read 92.9 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 69.6 270% 79.2 MB/s	DQ Read 462 DQ Write 391 DQ Mixed 432 322% 428 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 301GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 125 125 127 127 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 97.5 Write 97.8 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 126 64% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.9 355% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 216 218 219 220 218 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 30GB free, PID 00c2 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 9.3 10 12 11 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.91% Terrible	Read 25.2 Write 3.2 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 10 13% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.91% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	MC Read 74.8 MC Write 67.3 MC Mixed 73.7 206% 71.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 43.1 SC Mixed 28.3 86% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16