ADD TO PC
BUILD

Interpro IPW-CL

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Interpro IPW-CL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME Z390-A
Memory	49.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190129
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '19 at 17:03
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 146 2-Core 286 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 549 8-Core 918 89% 733 Pts	64-Core 1,566 97% 1,566 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.9% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 112 Parallax 105 83% 106 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 96 Splatting 100 80% 98 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234 10,709 User benchmarks, average bench 290% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1335 1008 1029 1005 1000 1016 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	310% Outstanding	Read 2,404 Write 2,172 Mixed 1432 SusWrite 1,066 395% 1,768 MB/s	4K Read 54.8 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 81 269% 97 MB/s	DQ Read 1,551 DQ Write 1,372 DQ Mixed 1,434 1,083% 1,453 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 310% Great: 371%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 466GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2030 929 794 798 798 798 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	334% Outstanding	Read 2,512 Write 2,305 Mixed 1,713 SusWrite 1,024 422% 1,889 MB/s	4K Read 72.8 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 100 334% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,612 DQ Write 1,428 DQ Mixed 1,493 1,127% 1,511 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 334% Great: 355%
Hitachi HUS726T4TALA6L4 4TB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 3.5TB free Firmware: VLGNW40H SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 172 187 172 181 174 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 48.2 Write 165 Mixed 40 SusWrite 177 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.7 211% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 4x16GB 205 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	91% Outstanding	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 35.2 MC Mixed 28.1 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 36.2 SC Mixed 28 81% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 60.7 66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback