Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 304 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 78.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 230 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 905 80% 676 Pts	64-Core 2,402 149% 2,402 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 87%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: AC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 181 193 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 188 Write 134 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 62.3 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 4x16GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.6% Very good	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 23.1 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 17.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	132x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	117x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples	99x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	150x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	103x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	94x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	52x
MTFDDAK512MBF-1A 512GBCrucialBench 89%, 258 samples	48x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	38x

RAM
M393A2K40BB1-CRC 8x16GBSamsungBench 113%, 218 samples	43x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples	39x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	39x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $95

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16