| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180702 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 13 '19 at 14:46 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
|
95.8%
Outstanding
|
96% 174 Pts
|
88% 731 Pts
|
95% 1,540 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
106%
Outstanding
|
108% 130 fps
|
107% 135 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vaseky V800/500G 500GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 273 87 30 82 32 MB/s
|
50.6%
Above average
|
57% 258 MB/s
|
76% 18.3 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
37GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 41 46 49 46 MB/s
|
22.3%
Poor
|
25% 34 MB/s
|
32% 0.33 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
289GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 83 87 91 89 MB/s
|
52.6%
Above average
|
54% 73.2 MB/s
|
132% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 08CD M378A1K43BB2-CRC 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.6%
Good
|
66% 23.3 GB/s
|
62% 21.8 GB/s
|
64% 62.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,511x |
| Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 832x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 573x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 401x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 346x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 338x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $844 |