Medion MD34166/C713

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion MD34166/C713 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B250H4-EM
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '19 at 14:23
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	41%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 95 2-Core 191 66% 119 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 318 40% 304 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.7% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 55.9 53% 61.6 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 61.1 Splatting 64 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49 58,154 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 213 163 217 126 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 760 Write 530 Mixed 533 SusWrite 174 111% 499 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 41.6 147% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 538 DQ Mixed 319 268% 378 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 157%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 672GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 101 97 103 104 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 87.5 Write 95.7 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 103 54% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB 5,762 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 10.8 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34166/C713 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Medion MD34166/C713

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	14x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	12x
RTX 3050Nvidia $230Bench 75%, 43,922 samples	3x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	1x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	7x
Samsung SSD 980 1TBNvmeBench 265%, 5,348 samples	2x
WDC PC SN730 SDB 1TBNvmeBench 234%, 1,015 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GBCorsairBench 73%, 8,488 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16