Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 13:35
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 376
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3103) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 19.8
19% 19.4 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 20
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 180GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 134 145 153 144 144 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.7% Good
Read 223
Write 170
Mixed 175
SusWrite 145
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 34.7
127% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 173
130% 174 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
206GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 92 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 88
Write 81.2
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 92.1
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
554GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 107 108 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 107
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
465GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 126 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 77
SusWrite 126
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 69%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
261GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 129 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 132
Write 121
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 129
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
205GB free
Firmware: GKAOA70M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 61.4
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 58.8
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.3% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback