Asus G75VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus G75VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VW
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 07:10
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.7% Average
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 137
51% 106 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 315
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 396
27% 396 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Asus(1043 2115) 2GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 358.50
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 18.9
5% 17.8 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 22.4
6% 20.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 29 32 29 28 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.7% Average
Read 265
Write 37.8
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 31.4
21% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 15.2
65% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 42
DQ Mixed 45.3
70% 143 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
147GB free
Firmware: 2AR2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 70 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 65
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 71.2
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 91 127 127 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
38% Below average
Read 49.8
Write 84.3
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 118
111% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 1,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus G75VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $219
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback