Panasonic CF-19RHRAG1M

Performance Results

Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation 24%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.01GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemPanasonic CF-19RHRAG1M  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF19-4
Memory5.4 GB free of 8.00781 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 06:22
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5 U 540
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 67
37% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 84.8
8-Core 82.6
12% 83.7 Pts
64-Core 85.3
6% 85.3 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.23% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.23%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 480GB-$148
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 504ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 129 126 136 134 138 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.6% Poor
Read 117
Write 173
Mixed 168
SusWrite 137
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 8.9
31% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 48GB
800, 800, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 40960 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.6
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CF-19RHRAG1M Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation 24%

System: Panasonic CF-19RHRAG1M

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback