Asus Rampage Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage Extreme  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090727
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 06:20
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$190
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
29.1% Poor
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 89.1
30% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 169
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 166
11% 166 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 11.4
3% 11.8 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 12
Splatting 7.5
3% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP112PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 43 39 26 37 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.1% Below average
Read 186
Write 145
Mixed 147
SusWrite 54.9
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 19
76% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 24.1
DQ Mixed 13.7
13% 20 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$59
713GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 115 116 114 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 114
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 69%
SMI USB DISK 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.1 3.7 2.9 4.2 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Read 16
Write 2.5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 3.2
6% 6.43 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 13%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
3GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 8.8 9.6 11 11 8.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Read 24
Write 9
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 8.7
14% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.1
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Rampage Extreme Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $270
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback