Asus GL702VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus GL702VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 05:07
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
60.6% Good
1-Core 94
2-Core 183
65% 138 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 511
53% 417 Pts
64-Core 511
34% 511 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.6% Average
Lighting 190
Reflection 187
Parallax 187
49% 188 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 177
Splatting 158
50% 161 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 53%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 232 234 236 237 237 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 450
Write 432
Mixed 368
SusWrite 265
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 32.3
108% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 322
245% 329 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 95%
Crucial_ CT525MX300SS 525GB
319GB free
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 349 333 236 241 245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 256
Write 323
Mixed 281
SusWrite 293
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 21.6
71% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 134
99% 132 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 64GB
28GB free, PID 5599
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 9.8 10 12 11 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 8.7
Mixed 11
SusWrite 10.3
18% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.8
184% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3A1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.4
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 1,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback