Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 04:54
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8700K-$355
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
1-Core 131
2-Core 265
93% 198 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 778
78% 618 Pts
64-Core 960
64% 960 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$415
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 343
Reflection 313
Parallax 359
90% 338 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 321
Splatting 237
87% 256 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$116
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 128 133 119 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 405
Write 144
Mixed 202
SusWrite 125
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 37.9
152% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 158
121% 165 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 81%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$100
472GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 460 461 462 441 415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 451
Mixed 424
SusWrite 450
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 53.4
177% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 304
244% 343 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$65
897GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 129 128 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 162
Write 124
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 129
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 197 194 194 195 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 106
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 194
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%
WD My Book 25EE 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 146 147 146 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 150
Write 151
Mixed 116
SusWrite 147
191% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 70%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
638GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 104 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 165
Write 117
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 105
149% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
169% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 30.6
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 31
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 9,668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $1,547
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback