Biostar X370GT7

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar X370GT7 (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '19 at 02:01
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 192 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 318 43% 321 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	38.2% Below average	Lighting 49.6 Reflection 32.8 Parallax 61.9 40% 48.1 fps	MRender 31.2 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 41 34% 41 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1358 Write 1,166 Mixed 1,079 267% 1,201 MB/s	4K Read 56.7 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 81.3 269% 95.9 MB/s	DQ Read 970 DQ Write 900 DQ Mixed 933 701% 934 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 104GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 306 303 306 305 307 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 462 Mixed 411 SusWrite 319 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 95.2 4K Mixed 56.4 186% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 359 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 394GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 186 190 187 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 130 Mixed 83.9 SusWrite 188 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C17 XMP 3000 15 2x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3266 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 43 MC Mixed 35.8 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 43.8 SC Mixed 28.4 94% 32.7 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370GT7 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar X370GT7

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	7x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	6x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	7x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	4x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	3x

SSD
GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GBXPGBench 215%, 12,312 samples	4x
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSabrent $100Bench 317%, 46,203 samples	4x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	3x

RAM
KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 8,345 samples	5x
BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 4x8GBCrucialBench 99%, 656 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $302

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16