| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130419 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 13 '19 at 01:33 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.6%
Good
|
54% 84 Pts
|
31% 252 Pts
|
21% 337 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
|
28.5%
Poor
|
29% 31.1 fps
|
28% 34.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 84 77 86 81 MB/s
|
26.9%
Poor
|
24% 108 MB/s
|
50% 15.8 MB/s
|
12% 16 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
905GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 89 89 85 88 82 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
89% 122 MB/s
|
159% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.4%
Poor
|
22% 7.9 GB/s
|
20% 7.13 GB/s
|
56% 70.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LX/BR Builds (Compare 315 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 125x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 49x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 42x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 26x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
| RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 24x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $75 |