Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus H87M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 01:12
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-4460-$185
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.1% Good
1-Core 98
2-Core 192
68% 145 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 361
49% 358 Pts
64-Core 370
25% 370 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.2
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 119
Reflection 104
Parallax 128
31% 117 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 108
Splatting 89.6
31% 101 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 32%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$160
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 397 414 413 408 407 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 418
Mixed 298
SusWrite 404
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 36
133% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 199
174% 257 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 107%
ST2000DM001-1CH164 960GB
644GB free
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 406 411 411 413 414 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 334
Write 107
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 409
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 10.4
50% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 16.5
13% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 91% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 167 180 181 181 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 112
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 171
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 115%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
219GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 86.4
Write 83.5
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 84.9
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 21.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $518
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback