MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170901
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 23:25
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8700K-$365
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
1-Core 131
2-Core 252
91% 192 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 780
79% 625 Pts
64-Core 976
66% 976 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7B45) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4758
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 26.3
6% 26.6 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 0.3
5% 15.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 561 315 116 104 85 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,886
Write 756
Mixed 614
SusWrite 216
190% 868 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 59.9
224% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,166
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 910
680% 917 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 198%
Great: 259%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$75
9GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 67 67 71 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 56.2
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 68.1
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 103%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$270
987GB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 215 215 213 217 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 117%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$210
5TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 137 136 139 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 108%
StoreJet Transcend 4TB
673GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 87 84 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 62
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 74.6
87% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 58%
StoreJet Transcend 4TB
892GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 75 75 75 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 87.8
Write 81.2
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 75.1
100% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 105%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 8,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,425
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback